Online Office System
News
- 2026 Greater Bay Area International Academic Paper Competition: No Review Fees,
- Leveraging Intelligent Tools to Enhance Competitiveness in Submitting to Interna
- AI Intelligent Review: The "Intelligent Facilitator" in the Field of Academic Pu
- Chinese AI Publishing Standards: The Inevitable Path of Independent Innovation a
- NEM: Sharing Chinese Wisdom for Global Scholarly Synergy!
Contact Us
Email:NEMPublishing@163.com
Tel(Beijing): 010-69313991;
010-58563191 ;010-58563176
Journals(Abstract)
The Boundaries of Rights in AI-Generated Content and Reflections on Political Philosophy
Miao Shirui
Hubei University
Abstract:
The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence has reshaped the traditional paradigm of content production and knowledge dissemination. The widespread adoption of artificial intelligence collaborative creation and automated intelligent content generation has made the division of ownership and rights boundaries of AI generated content, as well as the adaptation of value norms, a core topic of academic research. The content generated by artificial intelligence is generated through algorithm models trained on large-scale datasets, involving intertwined interests among multiple stakeholders including developers, users, and data rights holders. Therefore, the traditional intellectual property system needs to further adapt to intelligent content production scenarios. This article explores the actual conflicts surrounding the boundaries of rights, the underlying logic of political philosophy, and the reconstruction of methods for governing rights. It systematically reviews the ownership framework and limitations of content generated by artificial intelligence, analyzes the fundamental reasons for rights conflicts, draws on classical political philosophy theories for value based exploration, and develops a refined rights supervision and diversified governance system suitable for the intelligent era.
Key Words:
AI-generated content; rights boundaries; intellectual property; political philosophy; digital governance